[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190828133256.13630-1-efremov@linux.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:32:56 +0300
From: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: check for nested unlikely calls
IS_ERR, IS_ERR_OR_NULL, IS_ERR_VALUE already contain unlikely optimization
internally. Thus, there is no point in calling these functions under
likely/unlikely.
This check is based on the coccinelle rule developed by Enrico Weigelt
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1559767582-11081-1-git-send-email-info@metux.net/
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 93a7edfe0f05..55b90e1334d2 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6480,6 +6480,12 @@ sub process {
"Using $1 should generally have parentheses around the comparison\n" . $herecurr);
}
+# nested likely/unlikely calls
+ if ($line =~ /\b(?:(?:un)?likely)\s*\(!?\s*(IS_ERR(?:_OR_NULL|_VALUE)?)/) {
+ WARN("LIKELY_MISUSE",
+ "nested (un)?likely calls, unlikely already used in $1 internally\n" . $herecurr);
+ }
+
# whine mightly about in_atomic
if ($line =~ /\bin_atomic\s*\(/) {
if ($realfile =~ m@...ivers/@) {
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists