[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k1axjsjp.fsf@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:03:38 +0200
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: numlist API Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/9] printk-rb: add a new printk ringbuffer implementation
On 2019-08-28, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> I only think that, especially, numlist API is too generic in v4.
> It is not selfcontained. The consistency depends on external barriers.
>
> I believe that it might become fully self-contained and consistent
> if we reduce possibilities of the generic usage. In particular,
> the numlist should allow only linking of reusable structures
> stored in an array.
OK. I will make the numlist the master of the ID-to-node mapping. To
implement the getdesc() callback of the dataring, the printk_ringbuffer
can call a numlist mapping function. Also, numlist will need to provide
a function to bump the descriptor version (as your previous idea already
showed).
I plan to change the array to be numlist nodes. The ID would move into
the numlist node structure and a void-pointer private would be added so
that the numlist user can add private data (for printk_ringbuffer that
would just be a pointer to the dataring structure). When the
printk_ringbuffer gets a never-used numlist node, it can set the private
field.
This has the added benefit of making it easy to detect accidental
never-used descriptor usage when reading dataring garbage. This was
non-trivial and I'm still not sure I solved it correctly. (I've already
spent a week working on a definitive answer to your email[0] asking
about this.)
John Ogness
[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190820151239.yzdqz56yeldlknln@pathway.suse.cz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists