[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190828143123.971884723@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:24:46 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: [patch 1/2] x86/mm/pti: Handle unaligned address gracefully in
pti_clone_pagetable()
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
pti_clone_pmds() assumes that the supplied address is either:
- properly PUD/PMD aligned
or
- the address is actually mapped which means that independent
of the mapping level (PUD/PMD/PTE) the next higher mapping
exist.
If that's not the case the unaligned address can be incremented by PUD or
PMD size wrongly. All callers supply mapped and/or aligned addresses, but
for robustness sake, it's better to handle that case proper and to emit a
warning.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190820202314.1083149-1-songliubraving@fb.com
---
arch/x86/mm/pti.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
@@ -330,13 +330,15 @@ pti_clone_pgtable(unsigned long start, u
pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
if (pud_none(*pud)) {
- addr += PUD_SIZE;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(addr & PUD_MASK);
+ addr = round_up(addr + 1, PUD_SIZE);
continue;
}
pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
- addr += PMD_SIZE;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(addr & PMD_MASK);
+ addr = round_up(addr + 1, PMD_SIZE);
continue;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists