[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190828151552.GA16855@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:15:52 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: always build llseek.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:21:06PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 64bit !COMPAT does not build because the llseek syscall is in the tables.
Well, this will bloat thinkgs like 64-bit RISC-V for no good reason.
Please introduce a WANT_LSEEK like symbol that ppc64 can select instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists