linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: intel-sdxc-phy: Add YAML schema for LGM SDXC PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:37:17 +0000
From:   "Langer, Thomas" <thomas.langer@...el.com>
To:     "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>,
        "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        "Kim, Cheol Yong" <cheol.yong.kim@...el.com>,
        "Wu, Qiming" <qi-ming.wu@...el.com>,
        "Liem, Peter Harliman" <peter.harliman.liem@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: intel-sdxc-phy: Add YAML
 schema for LGM SDXC PHY

Hi Vadivel,

> +...
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d0b78805e49f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,syscon.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Syscon for eMMC/SDXC PHY Device Tree Bindings

This says the binding is for eMMC/SDXC

> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan
> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: intel,syscon

but this is a generic syscon, behind which are many registers, not only for
eMMC/SDXC. Also, the registers will be different for each SoC and needed for
many different drivers, that is why in your example it is called "chiptop"
-> toplevel registers not belonging to a specific HW module.

Rob: Do you also think this "intel,syscon" is too generic?
     And the binding should be outside the "phy" folder?

What is the way to support different SoCs with this? 
Must the driver referencing this syscon be aware of these differences?

> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#reset-cells":
> +   const: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - "#reset-cells"
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    sysconf: chiptop@...20000 {
> +       compatible = "intel,syscon", "syscon";
> +       reg = <0xe0020000 0x100>;
> +       #reset-cells = <1>;
> +    };
> --
> 2.11.0

Best regards,
Thomas