linux-kernel - Re: Kernel 5.3.x, 5.2.2+: VMware player suspend on 64/32 bit guests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908281747080.1938@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:50:23 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@...il.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel 5.3.x, 5.2.2+: VMware player suspend on 64/32 bit
 guests

Woody,

On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, Woody Suwalski wrote:

> I have tried to "bisect" the config changes, and builds working/not
> working between
>  rc3-rc4-rc5, and come out with the same frustrating result, that
> building a "clean" kernel is not producing the same behavoir as
> incremental building while bisecting.

So what you say is that:

   make clean; make menuconfig (change some option); make

and

   make menuconfig (change some option); make

produces different results?

That needs to be fixed first. If you can't trust your build system then you
cannot trust any result it produces.

What's you actual build procedure?

Thanks,

	tglx