[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829160946.GP4125@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:09:46 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
luto@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/2] rcu/tree: Remove dynticks_nmi_nesting counter
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:43:55AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Paul, do we also nuke rcu_eqs_special_set()? Currently I don't see anyone
> using it. And also remove the bottom most bit of dynticks?
>
> Also what happens if a TLB flush broadcast is needed? Do we IPI nohz or idle
> CPUs are the moment?
>
> All of this was introduced in:
> b8c17e6664c4 ("rcu: Maintain special bits at bottom of ->dynticks counter")
Adding Andy Lutomirski on CC.
Andy, is this going to be used in the near term, or should we just get
rid of it?
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists