[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f20fbee-db57-5db6-eddb-7e22647423b6@kleine-koenig.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 19:19:40 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] tty/serial: imx: make use of format specifier %dE
On 8/29/19 3:43 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:40 AM Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org> wrote:
>>
>> I created a patch that teaches printk et al to emit a symbolic error
>> name for an error valued integer[1]. With that applied
>>
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get ipg clk: %dE\n", ret);
>>
>> emits
>>
>> ... failed to get ipg clk: EPROBE_DEFER
>>
>> if ret is -EPROBE_DEFER. Petr Mladek (i.e. one of the printk
>> maintainers) had concerns if this would be well received and worth the
>> effort. He asked to present it to a few subsystems. So for now, this
>> patch converting the imx UART driver shouldn't be applied yet but it
>> would be great to get some feedback about if you think that being able
>> to easily printk (for example) "EIO" instead of "-5" is a good idea.
>
>> Would it help you? Do you think it helps your users?
>
> No, it makes sense only for debug where the user is supposed to be
> developer and thus needs anyway to know code base better than average.
Would you go so far as to claim that
... failed to get ipg clk: -517
is better sometimes than the same message with a named error? I'd say it
is never better and in some cases worse because readers who don't
understand what -EPROBE_DEFER means won't understand -517 either. So
there is net win.
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists