linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 63/76] selftests: kvm: fix state save/load on processors without XSAVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190829181311.7562-63-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:12:58 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 63/76] selftests: kvm: fix state save/load on processors without XSAVE

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 54577e5018a8c0cb79c9a0fa118a55c68715d398 ]

state_test and smm_test are failing on older processors that do not
have xcr0.  This is because on those processor KVM does provide
support for KVM_GET/SET_XSAVE (to avoid having to rely on the older
KVM_GET/SET_FPU) but not for KVM_GET/SET_XCRS.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
index d2ad85fb01ac0..5f1ba3da2dbd3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
@@ -1059,9 +1059,11 @@ struct kvm_x86_state *vcpu_save_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid)
         TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XSAVE, r: %i",
                 r);
 
-	r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
-        TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i",
-                r);
+	if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) {
+		r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
+		TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i",
+			    r);
+	}
 
 	r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_SREGS, &state->sregs);
         TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_SREGS, r: %i",
@@ -1102,9 +1104,11 @@ void vcpu_load_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_x86_state *s
         TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XSAVE, r: %i",
                 r);
 
-	r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
-        TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i",
-                r);
+	if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) {
+		r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
+		TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i",
+			    r);
+	}
 
 	r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_SREGS, &state->sregs);
         TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_SREGS, r: %i",
-- 
2.20.1