lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829060942.GA1312@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:09:42 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc:     Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@...cle.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jon Grimm <Jon.Grimm@....com>, kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com, patrick.colp@...cle.com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Add an option to reload microcode even if
 revision is unchanged

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:33:22PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> During microcode development, its often required to test different versions
> of microcode. Intel microcode loader enforces loading only if the revision is
> greater than what is currently loaded on the cpu. Overriding this behavior
> allows us to reuse the same revision during development cycles.
> This facilty also allows us to share debug microcode with development
> partners for getting feedback before microcode release.
> 
> Microcode developers should have other ways to check which
> of their internal version is actually loaded. For e.g. checking a
> temporary MSR for instance. In order to reload the same microcode do as
> shown below.
> 
>  # echo 2 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload
> 
>  as root.
> 
> 
> I tested this on top of the parallel ucode load patch
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/1566506627-16536-2-git-send-email-mihai.carabas@oracle.com/
> 
> v2: [Mihai] Address comments from Boris
> 	- Support for AMD
> 	- add taint flag
> 	- removed global force_ucode_load and parameterized it.

As I've said before, I don't like the churn in this version and how it
turns out. I'll have a look at how to do this cleanly when I get some
free cycles.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ