[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1567059876.15320.3.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:24:36 +0800
From: Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
To: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
""René van Dorst\"" <opensource@...rst.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: extract irq related
code from core driver
Hi Frank/Matthias,
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 19:16 +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 23. August 2019 um 17:42 Uhr
> > Von: "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>
> > I suppose that's because 3/10 has code that should be in 2/10 and for some
> > reason 3/10 was not pushed for linux-next inclusion. Although it has the same
> > Acked-for-mfd-by tag.
> >
> > @Frank, can you test if adding 3/10 to your code base fixes the issue?
>
> adding part 3 [1] seems to fix the issue too
>
> [ 4.960051] mt6323-regulator mt6323-regulator: Chip ID = 0x2023
>
> thanks
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11110509/
Thanks for your comments.
The root cause seems I didn't split the code well.
I will fix it in the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists