linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 04/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop local variables in shrink_zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190829070019.12714-5-david@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:00:12 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop local variables in shrink_zone_span()

Especially, when checking for "all holes" we can avoid rechecking already
processed pieces (that we are removing) - use the updated zone data
instead (possibly already zero).

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 0a21f6f99753..d3c34bbeb36d 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -374,14 +374,11 @@ static unsigned long find_biggest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
 static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
 			     unsigned long end_pfn)
 {
-	unsigned long zone_start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
-	unsigned long z = zone_end_pfn(zone); /* zone_end_pfn namespace clash */
-	unsigned long zone_end_pfn = z;
 	unsigned long pfn;
 	int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
 
 	zone_span_writelock(zone);
-	if (zone_start_pfn == start_pfn) {
+	if (zone->zone_start_pfn == start_pfn) {
 		/*
 		 * If the section is smallest section in the zone, it need
 		 * shrink zone->zone_start_pfn and zone->zone_spanned_pages.
@@ -389,22 +386,29 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
 		 * for shrinking zone.
 		 */
 		pfn = find_smallest_section_pfn(nid, zone, end_pfn,
-						zone_end_pfn);
+						zone_end_pfn(zone));
 		if (pfn) {
+			zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn(zone) - pfn;
 			zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn;
-			zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn;
+		} else {
+			zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
+			zone->spanned_pages = 0;
 		}
-	} else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) {
+	} else if (zone_end_pfn(zone) == end_pfn) {
 		/*
 		 * If the section is biggest section in the zone, it need
 		 * shrink zone->spanned_pages.
 		 * In this case, we find second biggest valid mem_section for
 		 * shrinking zone.
 		 */
-		pfn = find_biggest_section_pfn(nid, zone, zone_start_pfn,
+		pfn = find_biggest_section_pfn(nid, zone, zone->zone_start_pfn,
 					       start_pfn);
 		if (pfn)
-			zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1;
+			zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone->zone_start_pfn + 1;
+		else {
+			zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
+			zone->spanned_pages = 0;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -413,8 +417,8 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
 	 * change the zone. But perhaps, the zone has only hole data. Thus
 	 * it check the zone has only hole or not.
 	 */
-	pfn = zone_start_pfn;
-	for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
+	for (pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
+	     pfn < zone_end_pfn(zone); pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
 		if (unlikely(!pfn_valid(pfn)))
 			continue;
 
-- 
2.21.0