[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0cf4e930-1132-1e7f-815b-57a08a1fe5de@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:43:31 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
MichaĆ Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix IOMMU field not populated on device
hot re-plug
Hi Janusz,
On 8/28/19 10:17 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>> We should avoid kernel panic when a intel_unmap() is called against
>> a non-existent domain.
> Does that mean you suggest to replace
> BUG_ON(!domain);
> with something like
> if (WARN_ON(!domain))
> return;
> and to not care of orphaned mappings left allocated? Is there a way to inform
> users that their active DMA mappings are no longer valid and they shouldn't
> call dma_unmap_*()?
>
>> But we shouldn't expect the IOMMU driver not
>> cleaning up the domain info when a device remove notification comes and
>> wait until all file descriptors being closed, right?
> Shouldn't then the IOMMU driver take care of cleaning up resources still
> allocated on device remove before it invalidates and forgets their pointers?
>
You are right. We need to wait until all allocated resources (iova and
mappings) to be released.
How about registering a callback for BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER, and
removing the domain info when the driver detachment completes?
> Thanks,
> Janusz
Best regards,
Baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists