[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829093238.GA23102@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 02:32:38 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
virtio-fs@...hat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] dax: remove block device dependencies
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 05:04:11PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Agree. In retrospect it was my laziness in the dax-device
> implementation to expect the block-device to be available.
>
> It looks like fs_dax_get_by_bdev() is an intercept point where a
> dax_device could be dynamically created to represent the subset range
> indicated by the block-device partition. That would open up more
> cleanup opportunities.
That seems like a decent short-term plan. But in the long I'd just let
dax call into the partition table parser directly, as we might want to
support partitions without first having to create a block device on top
of the dax device. Same for the badblocks handling story.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists