linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] powerpc/64: make buildable without CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:01:45 +0200
From:   Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
        Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] powerpc/64: make buildable without CONFIG_COMPAT

On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 23:46:24 -0700
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 06:43:50PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > +ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > +obj-y				+= sys_ppc32.o ptrace32.o signal_32.o
> > +endif  
> 
> This should be:
> 
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= sys_ppc32.o ptrace32.o signal_32.o

Yes, looks better.
> 
> >  /* This value is used to mark exception frames on the stack. */
> >  exception_marker:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > index 60436432399f..73d0f53ffc1a 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  
> >  	rseq_signal_deliver(&ksig, tsk->thread.regs);
> >  
> > -	if (is32) {
> > +	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT)) && is32) {  
> 
> I think we should fix the is_32bit_task definitions instead so that
> callers don't need this mess.  

Yes, that makes sense.

Thanks

Michal