[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829101118.GA9692@jamwan02-TSP300>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:11:25 +0000
From: "james qian wang (Arm Technology China)" <james.qian.wang@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mihail Atanassov <Mihail.Atanassov@....com>,
Ayan Halder <Ayan.Halder@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>, nd <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes
tree
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 01:06:37PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 51a44a28eefd ("drm/komeda: Add missing of_node_get() call")
>
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 8965ad8433ea ("drm/komeda: Enable dual-link support")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Hi Stephen:
Sorry for the conflict, and thank you very much.
Regards
James
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
> index 9d4d5075cc64,1ff7f4b2c620..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
> @@@ -127,7 -128,8 +129,8 @@@ static int komeda_parse_pipe_dt(struct
> pipe->of_output_port =
> of_graph_get_port_by_id(np, KOMEDA_OF_PORT_OUTPUT);
>
> + pipe->dual_link = pipe->of_output_links[0] && pipe->of_output_links[1];
> - pipe->of_node = np;
> + pipe->of_node = of_node_get(np);
>
> return 0;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists