[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829103604.GA13309@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 03:36:04 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
Li Guifu <bluce.liguifu@...wei.com>,
Fang Wei <fangwei1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] erofs: add on-disk layout
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:32:53PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> I can fix it up as you like but I still cannot get
> what is critical issues here.
The problem is that the whole codebase is way substandard quality,
looking a lot like Linux code from 20 years ago. Yes, we already have
plenty of code of that standard in the tree, but we should not add more.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists