[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190829105009.2265-8-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:49:48 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 08/29] timekeeping: Use proper ktime_add when adding nsecs in coarse offset
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
[ Upstream commit 0354c1a3cdf31f44b035cfad14d32282e815a572 ]
While this doesn't actually amount to a real difference, since the macro
evaluates to the same thing, every place else operates on ktime_t using
these functions, so let's not break the pattern.
Fixes: e3ff9c3678b4 ("timekeeping: Repair ktime_get_coarse*() granularity")
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621203249.3909-1-Jason@zx2c4.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 443edcddac8ab..c2708e1f0c69f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ ktime_t ktime_get_coarse_with_offset(enum tk_offsets offs)
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&tk_core.seq, seq));
- return base + nsecs;
+ return ktime_add_ns(base, nsecs);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ktime_get_coarse_with_offset);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists