[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bca4169ed95402eb32448379f56c2aa@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:33:10 +0000
From: "zhangsha (A)" <zhangsha.zhang@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "j.vosburgh@...il.com" <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
"vfalico@...il.com" <vfalico@...il.com>,
"andy@...yhouse.net" <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
yuehaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
hunongda <hunongda@...wei.com>,
"Chenzhendong (alex)" <alex.chen@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] bonding: force enable lacp port after link state
recovery for 802.3ad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: 2019年8月28日 6:05
> To: zhangsha (A) <zhangsha.zhang@...wei.com>
> Cc: j.vosburgh@...il.com; vfalico@...il.com; andy@...yhouse.net;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; yuehaibing
> <yuehaibing@...wei.com>; hunongda <hunongda@...wei.com>;
> Chenzhendong (alex) <alex.chen@...wei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bonding: force enable lacp port after link state
> recovery for 802.3ad
>
> From: <zhangsha.zhang@...wei.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:42:09 +0800
>
> > - If speed/duplex getting failed here, the link status
> > will be changed to BOND_LINK_FAIL;
>
> How does it fail at this step? I suspect this is a driver specific problem.
Hi, David,
I'm really sorry for the delayed email and appreciated for your feedback.
I was testing in kernel 4.19 with a Huawei hinic card when the problem occurred.
I checked the dmesg and got the logs in the following order:
1) link status definitely down for interface eth6, disabling it
2) link status up again after 0 ms for interface eth6
3) the paterner's system mac becomes to "00:00:00:00:00:00".
By reading the codes, I think that the link status of the slave should be changed
to BOND_LINK_FAIL from BOND_LINK_DOWN.
As this problem has only occurred once only, I am not very sure about whether this is a
driver specific problem or not at the moment. But I find the commit 4d2c0cda,
its log says " Some NIC drivers don't have correct speed/duplex settings at the
time they send NETDEV_UP notification ...", so I prefer to believe it's not.
To my problem I think it is not enough that link-monitoring (miimon) only set
SPEED/DUPLEX right, the lacp port should be enabled too at the same time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists