[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASs2qkpGY_BkL--hvmKm3FJ9sEK4+v5VVYc1_CrowAB4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 20:45:27 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, vdumpa@...dia.com,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dma-contiguous: Use fallback alloc_pages for
single pages
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:23 PM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:53 PM Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:55 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:03:14PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > Yes, this makes my driver working again
> > > > when CONFIG_DMA_CMA=y.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I apply the following, my driver gets back working
> > > > irrespective of CONFIG_DMA_CMA.
> > >
> > > That sounds a lot like the device simply isn't 64-bit DMA capable, and
> > > previously always got CMA allocations under the limit it actually
> > > supported. I suggest that you submit this quirk to the mmc maintainers.
> >
> >
> > I tested v5.2 and my MMC host controller works with
> > dma_address that exceeds 32-bit physical address.
> >
> > So, I believe my MMC device is 64-bit DMA capable.
> >
> > I am still looking into the code
> > to find out what was changed.
>
>
> I retract this comment.
>
> Prior to bd2e75633c8012fc8a7431c82fda66237133bf7e,
> the descriptor table for ADMA is placed within the
> 32-bit phys address range, not exceeds the 32-bit limit.
>
> Probably, my device is not 64-bit capable.
>
> I will talk to the hardware engineer,
> and check the hardware spec just in case.
>
After looking more into my hardware,
I found out how to fix my driver:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1121600/
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists