[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829115457.GC6590@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:54:57 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: zhigang lu <luzhigang001@...il.com>
Cc: mike.kravetz@...cle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tonnylu@...cent.com,
hzhongzhang@...cent.com, knightzhang@...cent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: avoid looping to the same hugepage if !pages
and !vmas
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 07:37:22PM +0800, zhigang lu wrote:
> This change greatly decrease the time of mmaping a file in hugetlbfs.
> With MAP_POPULATE flag, it takes about 50 milliseconds to mmap a
> existing 128GB file in hugetlbfs. With this change, it takes less
> then 1 millisecond.
You're going to need to find a new way of sending patches; this patch is
mangled by your mail system.
> @@ -4391,6 +4391,17 @@ long follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> break;
> }
> }
> +
> + if (!pages && !vmas && !pfn_offset &&
> + (vaddr + huge_page_size(h) < vma->vm_end) &&
> + (remainder >= pages_per_huge_page(h))) {
> + vaddr += huge_page_size(h);
> + remainder -= pages_per_huge_page(h);
> + i += pages_per_huge_page(h);
> + spin_unlock(ptl);
> + continue;
> + }
The concept seems good to me. The description above could do with some
better explanation though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists