linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: use lower/upper_32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20e6bfc4-b56a-780f-2dd8-d80af1fd1947@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:19:33 +0300
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: use lower/upper_32_bits() macros for DMA
 addresses

On 29/08/19 2:22 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Currently, the DMA addresses are casted to (u64) for the upper 32bits
> to avoid "right shift count >= width of type" warning.
> 
> <linux/kernel.h> provides macros to address this, and I like the macro
> names are self-documenting.
> 
> I introduced a new helper, sdhci_set_adma_addr() to avoid the code
> duplication.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>

Even better, thanks!

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>

> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   - Another way to reduce linu wrapping
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 08cc0792c174..66c2cf89ee22 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -668,10 +668,10 @@ void sdhci_adma_write_desc(struct sdhci_host *host, void **desc,
>  	/* 32-bit and 64-bit descriptors have these members in same position */
>  	dma_desc->cmd = cpu_to_le16(cmd);
>  	dma_desc->len = cpu_to_le16(len);
> -	dma_desc->addr_lo = cpu_to_le32((u32)addr);
> +	dma_desc->addr_lo = cpu_to_le32(lower_32_bits(addr));
>  
>  	if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA)
> -		dma_desc->addr_hi = cpu_to_le32((u64)addr >> 32);
> +		dma_desc->addr_hi = cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(addr));
>  
>  	*desc += host->desc_sz;
>  }
> @@ -816,6 +816,13 @@ static void sdhci_adma_table_post(struct sdhci_host *host,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void sdhci_set_adma_addr(struct sdhci_host *host, dma_addr_t addr)
> +{
> +	sdhci_writel(host, lower_32_bits(addr), SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS);
> +	if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA)
> +		sdhci_writel(host, upper_32_bits(addr), SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS_HI);
> +}
> +
>  static dma_addr_t sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  {
>  	if (host->bounce_buffer)
> @@ -826,13 +833,10 @@ static dma_addr_t sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  
>  static void sdhci_set_sdma_addr(struct sdhci_host *host, dma_addr_t addr)
>  {
> -	if (host->v4_mode) {
> -		sdhci_writel(host, addr, SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS);
> -		if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA)
> -			sdhci_writel(host, (u64)addr >> 32, SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS_HI);
> -	} else {
> +	if (host->v4_mode)
> +		sdhci_set_adma_addr(host, addr);
> +	else
>  		sdhci_writel(host, addr, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> -	}
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int sdhci_target_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host,
> @@ -1095,12 +1099,7 @@ static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
>  			host->flags &= ~SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA;
>  		} else if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_ADMA) {
>  			sdhci_adma_table_pre(host, data, sg_cnt);
> -
> -			sdhci_writel(host, host->adma_addr, SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS);
> -			if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA)
> -				sdhci_writel(host,
> -					     (u64)host->adma_addr >> 32,
> -					     SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS_HI);
> +			sdhci_set_adma_addr(host, host->adma_addr);
>  		} else {
>  			WARN_ON(sg_cnt != 1);
>  			sdhci_set_sdma_addr(host, sdhci_sdma_address(host));
>