linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET v3 block/for-linus] IO cost model based work-conserving porportional controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f48b98fa-b33e-b3d3-2657-04f599e710fd@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:29:00 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, newella@...com, clm@...com,
        josef@...icpanda.com, dennisz@...com, lizefan@...wei.com,
        hannes@...xchg.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3 block/for-linus] IO cost model based work-conserving
 porportional controller

On 8/28/19 4:05 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Changes from v2[2]:
> 
> * Fixed a divide-by-zero bug in current_hweight().
> 
> * pre_start_time and friends renamed to alloc_time and now has its own
>    CONFIG option which is selected by IOCOST.

This looks fine to me now, I've queued it up for 5.4.

-- 
Jens Axboe