linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/4] i3c: master: Check if devices have i3c_dev_boardinfo on i3c_master_add_i3c_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SN6PR12MB2655B08176E14BE9DF2BACA2AEA20@SN6PR12MB2655.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:07:08 +0000
From:   Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
        Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "bbrezillon@...nel.org" <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com" <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] i3c: master: Check if devices have i3c_dev_boardinfo
 on i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked()

From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 15:39:41

> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:39:18 +0200
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:00:44 +0000
> > Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Boris,
> > > 
> > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
> > > Date: Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:44:57
> > >   
> > > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:19:33 +0200
> > > > Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com> wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > The I3C devices described in DT might not be attached to the master which
> > > > > doesn't allow to assign a specific dynamic address.    
> > > > 
> > > > I remember testing this when developing the framework, so, unless
> > > > another patch regressed it, it should already work. I suspect patch 1
> > > > is actually the regressing this use case.    
> > > 
> > > For today it doesn't address the case where the device is described with 
> > > static address = 0, which isn't attached to the controller.  
> > 
> > Hm, I'm pretty sure I had designed the code to support that case (see
> > [1]). It might be buggy, but nothing we can't fix I guess.
> > 
> 
> [1]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__elixir.bootlin.com_linux_v5.3-2Drc6_source_drivers_i3c_master.c-23L1898&d=DwICAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=qVuU64u9x77Y0Kd0PhDK_lpxFgg6PK9PateHwjb_DY0&m=IXS1ygIgEo5vwajk0iwd5aBDVBzRnVTjO3cg4iBmGNc&s=HC-AcYm-AZPrUBoALioej_BDnqOtJHltr39Z2yPkuU4&e= 

That is only valid if you have olddev which will only exist if static 
address != 0.