linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] freezer,NFS: add an unsafe schedule_timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:30:59 -0400
From:   "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@...hat.com>
To:     "kbuild test robot" <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, trond.myklebust@...merspace.com,
        anna.schumaker@...app.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, pavel@....cz,
        len.brown@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] freezer,NFS: add an unsafe schedule_timeout_interruptable
 freezable helper for NFS

Thanks robot!

I'll send a v2 that works with !CONFIG_FREEZER.

Ben

On 29 Aug 2019, at 7:02, kbuild test robot wrote:

> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [cannot apply to v5.3-rc6 next-20190828]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note 
> to help improve the system]
>
> url:    
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/freezer-NFS-add-an-unsafe-schedule_timeout_interruptable-freezable-helper-for-NFS/20190829-161623
> config: x86_64-randconfig-f004-201934 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-11) 7.4.0
> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=x86_64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c: In function 'nfs4_delay_interruptible':
>>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:418:2: error: implicit declaration of function 
>>> 'freezable_schedule_timeout_interruptible_unsafe'; did you mean 
>>> 'freezable_schedule_timeout_interruptible'? 
>>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      freezable_schedule_timeout_interruptible_unsafe(nfs4_update_delay(timeout));
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>      freezable_schedule_timeout_interruptible
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +418 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>
>    413	
>    414	static int nfs4_delay_interruptible(long *timeout)
>    415	{
>    416		might_sleep();
>    417	
>> 418		freezable_schedule_timeout_interruptible_unsafe(nfs4_update_delay(timeout));
>    419		if (!signal_pending(current))
>    420			return 0;
>    421		return __fatal_signal_pending(current) ? -EINTR :-ERESTARTSYS;
>    422	}
>    423	
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology 
> Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel 
> Corporation