linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] powerpc/perf: split callchain.c by bitness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190830210645.78931423@kitsune.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:06:45 +0200
From:   Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
        Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
        Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
        Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] powerpc/perf: split callchain.c by bitness

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:57:57 +0200
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de> wrote:

> Building callchain.c with !COMPAT proved quite ugly with all the
> defines. Splitting out the 32bit and 64bit parts looks better.
> 

BTW the powerpc callchain.c does not match any of the patterns of PERF
CORE in MAINTAINERS (unlike callchain implementation on other
platforms). Is that intentional?

Thanks

Michal