| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f2d5b474411b2940d62198490f06e77890fbdb32.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:44:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kunit: fix failure to build without printk
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 11:01 -0600, shuah wrote:
> On 8/28/19 3:49 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (08/28/19 02:31), Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > [..]
> > > Previously KUnit assumed that printk would always be present, which is
> > > not a valid assumption to make. Fix that by removing call to
> > > vprintk_emit, and calling printk directly.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/0352fae9-564f-4a97-715a-fabe016259df@kernel.org/T/#t
> > > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > > -static void kunit_vprintk(const struct kunit *test,
> > > - const char *level,
> > > - struct va_format *vaf)
> > > -{
> > > - kunit_printk_emit(level[1] - '0', "\t# %s: %pV", test->name, vaf);
> > > -}
> >
> > This patch looks good to me. I like the removal of recursive
> > vsprintf() (%pV).
> >
> > -ss
> >
>
> Hi Sergey,
>
> What are the guidelines for using printk(). I recall some discussion
> about not using printk(). I am seeing the following from checkpatch
> script:
>
>
> WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_level([subsystem]dev, ... then
> dev_level(dev, ... then pr_level(... to printk(KERN_LEVEL ...
> #105: FILE: include/kunit/test.h:343:
> + printk(KERN_LEVEL "\t# %s: " fmt, (test)->name, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
>
> Is there supposed to be pr_level() - I can find dev_level()
>
> cc'ing Joe Perches for his feedback on this message recommending
> pr_level() which isn't in 5.3.
I don't care for pr_level or KERN_LEVEL in a printk.
I think this is somewhat overly complicated.
I think I'd write it like:
---
include/kunit/test.h | 11 ++++-----
kunit/test.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 8b7eb03d4971..aa4abf0a22a5 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -339,9 +339,8 @@ static inline void *kunit_kzalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test);
-void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level,
- const struct kunit *test,
- const char *fmt, ...);
+__printf(2, 3)
+void kunit_printk(const struct kunit *test, const char *fmt, ...);
/**
* kunit_info() - Prints an INFO level message associated with @test.
@@ -353,7 +352,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level,
* Takes a variable number of format parameters just like printk().
*/
#define kunit_info(test, fmt, ...) \
- kunit_printk(KERN_INFO, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+ kunit_printk(test, KERN_INFO fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
/**
* kunit_warn() - Prints a WARN level message associated with @test.
@@ -364,7 +363,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level,
* Prints a warning level message.
*/
#define kunit_warn(test, fmt, ...) \
- kunit_printk(KERN_WARNING, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+ kunit_printk(test, KERN_WARNING fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
/**
* kunit_err() - Prints an ERROR level message associated with @test.
@@ -375,7 +374,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level,
* Prints an error level message.
*/
#define kunit_err(test, fmt, ...) \
- kunit_printk(KERN_ERR, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+ kunit_printk(test, KERN_ERR fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
/**
* KUNIT_SUCCEED() - A no-op expectation. Only exists for code clarity.
diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
index b2ca9b94c353..ddb9bffb5a5d 100644
--- a/kunit/test.c
+++ b/kunit/test.c
@@ -16,40 +16,6 @@ static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test)
WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false);
}
-static int kunit_vprintk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, va_list args)
-{
- return vprintk_emit(0, level, NULL, 0, fmt, args);
-}
-
-static int kunit_printk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, ...)
-{
- va_list args;
- int ret;
-
- va_start(args, fmt);
- ret = kunit_vprintk_emit(level, fmt, args);
- va_end(args);
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static void kunit_vprintk(const struct kunit *test,
- const char *level,
- struct va_format *vaf)
-{
- kunit_printk_emit(level[1] - '0', "\t# %s: %pV", test->name, vaf);
-}
-
-static void kunit_print_tap_version(void)
-{
- static bool kunit_has_printed_tap_version;
-
- if (!kunit_has_printed_tap_version) {
- kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, "TAP version 14\n");
- kunit_has_printed_tap_version = true;
- }
-}
-
static size_t kunit_test_cases_len(struct kunit_case *test_cases)
{
struct kunit_case *test_case;
@@ -63,11 +29,9 @@ static size_t kunit_test_cases_len(struct kunit_case *test_cases)
static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
- kunit_print_tap_version();
- kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, "\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name);
- kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO,
- "\t1..%zd\n",
- kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases));
+ pr_info_once("TAP version 14\n");
+ pr_info("\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name);
+ pr_info("\t1..%zd\n", kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases));
}
static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent,
@@ -87,9 +51,8 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent,
else
ok_not_ok = "not ok";
- kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO,
- "%s%s %zd - %s\n",
- indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description);
+ pr_info("%s%s %zd - %s\n",
+ indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description);
}
static bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite)
@@ -133,11 +96,11 @@ static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test,
kunit_err(test,
"Could not allocate buffer, dumping stream:\n");
list_for_each_entry(fragment, &stream->fragments, node) {
- kunit_err(test, fragment->fragment);
+ kunit_err(test, "%s", fragment->fragment);
}
kunit_err(test, "\n");
} else {
- kunit_err(test, buf);
+ kunit_err(test, "%s", buf);
kunit_kfree(test, buf);
}
}
@@ -505,19 +468,29 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
}
}
-void kunit_printk(const char *level,
- const struct kunit *test,
- const char *fmt, ...)
+void kunit_printk(const struct kunit *test, const char *fmt, ...)
{
+ char lvl[PRINTK_MAX_SINGLE_HEADER_LEN + 1] = "\0";
struct va_format vaf;
va_list args;
+ int kern_level;
va_start(args, fmt);
+ while ((kern_level = printk_get_level(fmt)) != 0) {
+ size_t size = printk_skip_level(fmt) - fmt;
+
+ if (kern_level >= '0' && kern_level <= '7') {
+ memcpy(lvl, fmt, size);
+ lvl[size] = '\0';
+ }
+ fmt += size;
+ }
+
vaf.fmt = fmt;
vaf.va = &args;
- kunit_vprintk(test, level, &vaf);
+ printk("%s\t# %s %pV\n", lvl, test->name, &vaf);
va_end(args);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists