linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 01/10] dt-bindings: soc: Add dvfsrc driver bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1567142798.5542.5.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:26:38 +0800
From:   Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "Viresh Kumar" <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Ryan Case <ryandcase@...omium.org>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...gle.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 01/10] dt-bindings: soc: Add dvfsrc driver bindings

On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 14:16 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:28:39 +0800, Henry Chen wrote:
> > Document the binding for enabling dvfsrc on MediaTek SoC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt    | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/dt-bindings/soc/mtk,dvfsrc.h               | 14 +++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/soc/mtk,dvfsrc.h
> > 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Hi Rob,

I'm sorry for the mistake. I stand corrected, and will add tags on next
version.

Henry