linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] [tip: x86/vmware] input/vmmouse: Update the backdoor call with support for new instructions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:33:26 +0800
From:   Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
        x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        pv-drivers@...are.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tip-bot2 for Thomas Hellstrom <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>,
        Doug Covelli <dcovelli@...are.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>,
        kbuild-all@...org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [tip: x86/vmware] input/vmmouse: Update the
 backdoor call with support for new instructions

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:20:53PM +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 08:06:27AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Philip,
> > 
> > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Philip Li wrote:
> > 
> > > > wanna test trees, I'd suggest simply testing TIP's tip/master branch
> > > > which gets redone on a daily basis instead of testing patches in the
> > > > tip-bot{,2} notification mails.
> > >
> > > Thanks Boris for the input. Besides the repo monitoring, we also check the patches
> > > in mailing lists, and try to apply patch to a suitable base. Do you think we can
> > > skip the mailing list of tip-bot{,2}?
> > 
> > As I just explained in a reply to another random build failure caused by this.
> > 
> > tip-bot2 is a notification mechanism to let people know that a particular
> > patch has been merged into one of the tip tree branches. These mails are
> > also properly threaded most of the time and reply to the patch which was
> > sent to the mailing list.
> > 
> > So yes, randomly picking patches from tip-bot2 is not useful at all. The
> > mails contain the information to which tip branch the patch has been
> > applied, so the only useful information for your bot is to select the
> > branch which got the new patches and start testing on that one.
> thanks for your patience. I just realize we actually block tip-bot, but
> not tip-bot2. I will update the logic to avoid this issue, and we will
> keep monitor for a while to fix new issue if any.
BTW: the related service need some time to be upgraded after code change,
some already fetched patches will continue sending out noisy mails until
they are consumed. Sorry about this.

> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	tglx