[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190830010051.GB857@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 09:00:51 +0800
From: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: lkp@...el.com, wang.yi59@....com.cn, wang.liang82@....com.cn,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cheng.lin130@....com.cn,
kbuild-all@...org, xue.zhihong@....com.cn, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] ipv6: Not to probe neighbourless routes
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:37:42PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> So yeah, this is one instance where the kbuild test robot's report is
> making more rather than less work for us.
sorry for the inconvenience caused. We monitor the lkml, and as you
point out, we will continuously improve to provide faster response.
>
> We identified the build problem within hours of this patch being
> posted and the updated version was posted more than 24 hours ago.
>
> The kbuild robot should really have a way to either:
>
> 1) Report build problems faster, humans find the obvious cases like
> this one within a day or less.
thanks, we will continue working on this to speed up
>
> 2) Notice that a new version of the patch was posted or that a human
> responded to the patch pointing out the build problem.
thanks, we will enhance the patch testing to consider these ideas.
>
> Otherwise we get postings like this which is just more noise to
> delete.
>
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list
> kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all
Powered by blists - more mailing lists