[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <d2d582fc17b7a469f9e7294fe0f868a8ed168c0d.1567151182.git.luoben@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:41:27 +0800
From: Ben Luo <luoben@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tao.ma@...ux.alibaba.com,
gerry@...ux.alibaba.com, nanhai.zou@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] genirq: enhance error recovery code in free irq
__free_irq()/__free_percpu_irq() need to return if called from IRQ
context because the interrupt handler loop runs with desc->lock dropped
and dev_id can be subject to load and store tearing. Also move WARNs
out of lock region and print out dev_id to help debugging.
Signed-off-by: Ben Luo <luoben@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index e8f7f17..10ec3e9 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1690,7 +1690,10 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, void *dev_id)
struct irqaction *action, **action_ptr;
unsigned long flags;
- WARN(in_interrupt(), "Trying to free IRQ %d from IRQ context!\n", irq);
+ if (WARN(in_interrupt(),
+ "Trying to free IRQ %d (dev_id %p) from IRQ context!\n",
+ irq, dev_id))
+ return NULL;
mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex);
chip_bus_lock(desc);
@@ -1705,10 +1708,11 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, void *dev_id)
action = *action_ptr;
if (!action) {
- WARN(1, "Trying to free already-free IRQ %d\n", irq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
+ WARN(1, "Trying to free already-free IRQ %d (dev_id %p)\n",
+ irq, dev_id);
return NULL;
}
@@ -2286,7 +2290,10 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, void __percpu *dev_
struct irqaction *action;
unsigned long flags;
- WARN(in_interrupt(), "Trying to free IRQ %d from IRQ context!\n", irq);
+ if (WARN(in_interrupt(),
+ "Trying to free IRQ %d (dev_id %p) from IRQ context!\n",
+ irq, dev_id))
+ return NULL;
if (!desc)
return NULL;
@@ -2295,14 +2302,17 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, void __percpu *dev_
action = desc->action;
if (!action || action->percpu_dev_id != dev_id) {
- WARN(1, "Trying to free already-free IRQ %d\n", irq);
- goto bad;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ WARN(1, "Trying to free already-free IRQ (dev_id %p) %d\n",
+ dev_id, irq);
+ return NULL;
}
if (!cpumask_empty(desc->percpu_enabled)) {
- WARN(1, "percpu IRQ %d still enabled on CPU%d!\n",
- irq, cpumask_first(desc->percpu_enabled));
- goto bad;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ WARN(1, "percpu IRQ %d (dev_id %p) still enabled on CPU%d!\n",
+ irq, dev_id, cpumask_first(desc->percpu_enabled));
+ return NULL;
}
/* Found it - now remove it from the list of entries: */
@@ -2317,10 +2327,6 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, void __percpu *dev_
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
module_put(desc->owner);
return action;
-
-bad:
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
- return NULL;
}
/**
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists