[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190830113216.GE2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:32:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: memory-model: add it to the Documentation body
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 01:25:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Looks like a pretty clear consensus thus far. Any objections to keeping
> these .txt for the time being?
Obviously I'm a huge proponent of abandoning RST and an advocate for
normal .txt files ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists