lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:36:45 +0800
From:   Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
        x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        pv-drivers@...are.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tip-bot2 for Thomas Hellstrom <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>,
        Doug Covelli <dcovelli@...are.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>,
        kbuild-all@...org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [tip: x86/vmware] input/vmmouse: Update the
 backdoor call with support for new instructions

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:06:50AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:20:53PM +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> > thanks for your patience. I just realize we actually block tip-bot, but
> > not tip-bot2. I will update the logic to avoid this issue, and we will
> > keep monitor for a while to fix new issue if any.
> 
> ... and just to reiterate: it would be a *lot-lot* more useful if you
> guys tested the single tip branches or the combined tip/master on a
> daily basis as that is the x86 queue that goes to Linus eventually. That
yes, we monitor the repo pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git, and will
send build status of head (like BUILD SUCCESS or REGRESSION), also provide
bisect report of unique error for first bad commit.

> is, if you do not test it already. But we don't get any "we tested this
> branch" email so I'm thinking you don't...
> 
> Thx.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ