[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190830170903.GB2263813@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:09:03 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-next] writeback: add tracepoints for cgroup
foreign writebacks
Hello, Jan.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 06:42:11PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Well, but if you look at __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() it is careful. It
> does:
>
> struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
>
> if (!mapping) {
> bail
> }
> ... use mapping
>
> Exactly because page->mapping can become NULL under your hands if you don't
> hold page lock. So I think you either need something similar in your
> tracepoint or handle this in the caller.
So, account_page_dirtied() is called from two places.
__set_page_dirty() and __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(). The following is
from the latter.
lock_page_memcg(page);
if (!TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
...
if (!mapping) {
unlock_page_memcg(page);
return 1;
}
xa_lock_irqsave(&mapping->i_pages, flags);
BUG_ON(page_mapping(page) != mapping);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!PagePrivate(page) && !PageUptodate(page));
account_page_dirtied(page, mapping);
...
If I'm reading it right, it's saying that at this point if mapping
exists after setting page dirty, it must not change while locking
i_pages.
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers() is more brief but seems to be making the
same assumption.
xa_lock_irqsave(&mapping->i_pages, flags);
if (page->mapping) { /* Race with truncate? */
WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && !PageUptodate(page));
account_page_dirtied(page, mapping);
__xa_set_mark(&mapping->i_pages, page_index(page),
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
}
xa_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->i_pages, flags);
Both are clearly assuming that once i_pages is locked, mapping can't
change. So, inside account_page_dirtied(), mapping clearly can't
change. The TP in question - track_foreign_dirty - is invoked from
mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty() which is only called from
account_page_dirty(), so I'm failing to see how mapping would change
there.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists