linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 2/9] sched: add search limit as per latency-nice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190830174944.21741-3-subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:49:37 -0700
From:   subhra mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        steven.sistare@...cle.com, dhaval.giani@...cle.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, parth@...ux.ibm.com,
        patrick.bellasi@....com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/9] sched: add search limit as per latency-nice

Put upper and lower limit on CPU search in select_idle_cpu. The lower limit
is set to amount of CPUs in a core  while upper limit is derived from the
latency-nice of the thread. This ensures for any architecture we will
usually search beyond a core. Changing the latency-nice value by user will
change the search cost making it appropriate for given workload.

Signed-off-by: subhra mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b08d00c..c31082d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6188,7 +6188,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 	u64 avg_cost, avg_idle;
 	u64 time, cost;
 	s64 delta;
-	int cpu, nr = INT_MAX;
+	int cpu, floor, nr = INT_MAX;
 
 	this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc));
 	if (!this_sd)
@@ -6205,11 +6205,12 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 		return -1;
 
 	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
-		u64 span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
-		if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost)
-			nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
-		else
-			nr = 4;
+		floor = cpumask_weight(topology_sibling_cpumask(target));
+		if (floor < 2)
+			floor = 2;
+		nr = (p->latency_nice * sd->span_weight) / LATENCY_NICE_MAX;
+		if (nr < floor)
+			nr = floor;
 	}
 
 	time = local_clock();
-- 
2.9.3