[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5186fae-ac58-a5f5-f9dc-b749ade7285d@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 18:32:28 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <ebiggers@...nel.org>
CC: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4 crypto: fix to check feature status before get
policy
Hi,
Is this change not necessary? A month has passed...
Thanks,
On 2019/8/4 17:56, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>
> When getting fscrypto policy via EXT4_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY, if
> encryption feature is off, it's better to return EOPNOTSUPP instead
> of ENODATA, so let's add ext4_has_feature_encrypt() to do the check
> for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> index 442f7ef873fc..bf87835c1237 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> @@ -1112,9 +1112,11 @@ long ext4_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> #endif
> }
> - case EXT4_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY:
> + case EXT4_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY: {
> + if (!ext4_has_feature_encrypt(sb))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> return fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy(filp, (void __user *)arg);
> -
> + }
> case EXT4_IOC_FSGETXATTR:
> {
> struct fsxattr fa;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists