[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190831105410.061248409@goodmis.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:53:31 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 2/7] ftrace: Check for empty hash and comment the race with registering
probes
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
The race between adding a function probe and reading the probes that exist
is very subtle. It needs a comment. Also, the issue can also happen if the
probe has has the EMPTY_HASH as its func_hash.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 7b60f3d876156 ("ftrace: Dynamically create the probe ftrace_ops for the trace_array")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 80beed2cf0da..6200a6fe10e3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -3096,7 +3096,11 @@ t_probe_next(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
hash = iter->probe->ops.func_hash->filter_hash;
- if (!hash)
+ /*
+ * A probe being registered may temporarily have an empty hash
+ * and it's at the end of the func_probes list.
+ */
+ if (!hash || hash == EMPTY_HASH)
return NULL;
size = 1 << hash->size_bits;
@@ -4324,6 +4328,10 @@ register_ftrace_function_probe(char *glob, struct trace_array *tr,
mutex_unlock(&ftrace_lock);
+ /*
+ * Note, there's a small window here that the func_hash->filter_hash
+ * may be NULL or empty. Need to be carefule when reading the loop.
+ */
mutex_lock(&probe->ops.func_hash->regex_lock);
orig_hash = &probe->ops.func_hash->filter_hash;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists