linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET block/for-next] IO cost model based work-conserving porportional controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190831112010.GG2263813@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date:   Sat, 31 Aug 2019 04:20:10 -0700
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, newella@...com, clm@...com,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, dennisz@...com,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@...com,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET block/for-next] IO cost model based work-conserving
 porportional controller

Hello,

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 09:10:26AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> thank you very much for this extra information, I'll try the
> configuration you suggest.  In this respect, is this still the branch
> to use
> 
> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup/+/refs/heads/review-iocost-v2
> 
> also after the issue spotted two days ago [1]?

block/for-next is the branch which has all the updates.

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next

Thanks.

-- 
tejun