lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190901030514.GC1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 1 Sep 2019 04:05:14 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@....com>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/staging/exfat - by default, prohibit mount of
 fat/vfat

On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:37:19AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:

> fs/orangefs/file.c
>  19 static int flush_racache(struct inode *inode)

Just why the hell would _that_ one be a problem?  It's static in
file; it can't pollute the namespace even if linked into the
kernel.

Folks, let's keep at least some degree of sanity - this is sinking
to the level of certain killfile denizens...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ