[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN2PR04MB699135203C45147049130AB6FCBF0@MN2PR04MB6991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 06:12:15 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/3] Qualcomm UFS device reset support
Hi,
>
> This series adds a new ufs vops to allow platform specific methods for
> resetting an attached UFS device, then implements this for the
> Qualcomm driver.
> This reset seems to be necessary for the majority of Dragonboard845c
> devices.
>
> Bean requested in v3 that a software fallback mechanism, using
> UIC_CMD_DME_END_PT_RST. I have not been successful in validating
> that this
> works for me, so I'm postponing this effort and hoping we can add it
> incrementally at a later time.
This series looks good to me.
Yeah - We can add and test the uic command bail-out once this is accepted.
Thanks,
Avri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists