| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 22:35:24 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] crypto: arm - Rename functions to avoid conflict with crypto/sha256.h
Rename static / file-local functions so that they do not conflict with
the functions declared in crypto/sha256.h.
This is a preparation patch for folding crypto/sha256.h into crypto/sha.h.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
---
arch/arm/crypto/sha256_glue.c | 8 ++++----
arch/arm/crypto/sha256_neon_glue.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/crypto/sha256_glue.c b/arch/arm/crypto/sha256_glue.c
index 70efa9656bff..215497f011f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/crypto/sha256_glue.c
+++ b/arch/arm/crypto/sha256_glue.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int crypto_sha256_arm_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(crypto_sha256_arm_update);
-static int sha256_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
+static int crypto_sha256_arm_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
{
sha256_base_do_finalize(desc,
(sha256_block_fn *)sha256_block_data_order);
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ int crypto_sha256_arm_finup(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
{
sha256_base_do_update(desc, data, len,
(sha256_block_fn *)sha256_block_data_order);
- return sha256_final(desc, out);
+ return crypto_sha256_arm_final(desc, out);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(crypto_sha256_arm_finup);
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static struct shash_alg algs[] = { {
.digestsize = SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE,
.init = sha256_base_init,
.update = crypto_sha256_arm_update,
- .final = sha256_final,
+ .final = crypto_sha256_arm_final,
.finup = crypto_sha256_arm_finup,
.descsize = sizeof(struct sha256_state),
.base = {
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static struct shash_alg algs[] = { {
.digestsize = SHA224_DIGEST_SIZE,
.init = sha224_base_init,
.update = crypto_sha256_arm_update,
- .final = sha256_final,
+ .final = crypto_sha256_arm_final,
.finup = crypto_sha256_arm_finup,
.descsize = sizeof(struct sha256_state),
.base = {
diff --git a/arch/arm/crypto/sha256_neon_glue.c b/arch/arm/crypto/sha256_neon_glue.c
index a7ce38a36006..38645e415196 100644
--- a/arch/arm/crypto/sha256_neon_glue.c
+++ b/arch/arm/crypto/sha256_neon_glue.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
asmlinkage void sha256_block_data_order_neon(u32 *digest, const void *data,
unsigned int num_blks);
-static int sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
- unsigned int len)
+static int crypto_sha256_neon_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
+ unsigned int len)
{
struct sha256_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ static int sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
return 0;
}
-static int sha256_finup(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
- unsigned int len, u8 *out)
+static int crypto_sha256_neon_finup(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
+ unsigned int len, u8 *out)
{
if (!crypto_simd_usable())
return crypto_sha256_arm_finup(desc, data, len, out);
@@ -59,17 +59,17 @@ static int sha256_finup(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
return sha256_base_finish(desc, out);
}
-static int sha256_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
+static int crypto_sha256_neon_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
{
- return sha256_finup(desc, NULL, 0, out);
+ return crypto_sha256_neon_finup(desc, NULL, 0, out);
}
struct shash_alg sha256_neon_algs[] = { {
.digestsize = SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE,
.init = sha256_base_init,
- .update = sha256_update,
- .final = sha256_final,
- .finup = sha256_finup,
+ .update = crypto_sha256_neon_update,
+ .final = crypto_sha256_neon_final,
+ .finup = crypto_sha256_neon_finup,
.descsize = sizeof(struct sha256_state),
.base = {
.cra_name = "sha256",
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ struct shash_alg sha256_neon_algs[] = { {
}, {
.digestsize = SHA224_DIGEST_SIZE,
.init = sha224_base_init,
- .update = sha256_update,
- .final = sha256_final,
- .finup = sha256_finup,
+ .update = crypto_sha256_neon_update,
+ .final = crypto_sha256_neon_final,
+ .finup = crypto_sha256_neon_finup,
.descsize = sizeof(struct sha256_state),
.base = {
.cra_name = "sha224",
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists