[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190902075006.GB754@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 00:50:06 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] PCI: Use GFP_ATOMIC in resource_alignment_store()
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:49:32PM +0000, YueHaibing wrote:
> When allocating memory, the GFP_KERNEL cannot be used during the
> spin_lock period. It may cause scheduling when holding spin_lock.
>
> Fixes: f13755318675 ("PCI: Move pci_[get|set]_resource_alignment_param() into their callers")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 484e35349565..0b5fc6736f3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -6148,7 +6148,7 @@ static ssize_t resource_alignment_store(struct bus_type *bus,
> spin_lock(&resource_alignment_lock);
>
> kfree(resource_alignment_param);
> - resource_alignment_param = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL);
> + resource_alignment_param = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> spin_unlock(&resource_alignment_lock);
Why not move the allocation outside the lock? Something like this
seems much more sensible:
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 484e35349565..fe205829f676 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -6145,14 +6145,16 @@ static ssize_t resource_alignment_show(struct bus_type *bus, char *buf)
static ssize_t resource_alignment_store(struct bus_type *bus,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- spin_lock(&resource_alignment_lock);
+ char *param = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL);
- kfree(resource_alignment_param);
- resource_alignment_param = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!param)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ spin_lock(&resource_alignment_lock);
+ kfree(resource_alignment_param);
+ resource_alignment_param = param;
spin_unlock(&resource_alignment_lock);
-
- return resource_alignment_param ? count : -ENOMEM;
+ return count;
}
static BUS_ATTR_RW(resource_alignment);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists