[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190902103509.GA42552@architecture4>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 18:35:12 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
Li Guifu <bluce.liguifu@...wei.com>,
Fang Wei <fangwei1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] erofs: add on-disk layout
Hi Pavel,
(Thanks...)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:40:20AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> So __packed is right thing to do. If architecture accesses that
> slowly, that's ungood, but different structures between architectures
> would be really bad.
(...a little word, it seems that Christoph was trying to say that
it's unnecessary to __packed for this case since we designed most
erofs on-disk format in natural alignment... Anyway, I updated,
that seems okay...)
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Powered by blists - more mailing lists