linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in pci_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:54:54 +0100
From:   Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To:     Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        leoyang.li@....com, kishon@...com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        minghuan.Lian@....com, mingkai.hu@....com, roy.zang@....com,
        jingoohan1@...il.com, gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, arnd@...db.de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, zhiqiang.hou@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in
 pci_device_id table

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:16AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test can be used
> for testing PCIe EP in LS1088a.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - No change.
> v3:
>  - No change.
>  
>  drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> index 6e208a0..d531951 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> @@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = {
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA74x) },
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA72x) },
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x81c0) },
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x80c0) },

The Freescale PCI devices are the only devices in this table that don't
have a define for their device ID. I think a define should be created
for both of the device IDs above.

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

>  	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(SYNOPSYS, EDDA, NULL) },
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654),
>  	  .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&am654_data
> -- 
> 2.9.5
>