linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] perf machine: arm/arm64: Improve completeness for kernel address space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:15:11 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] perf machine: arm/arm64: Improve completeness for
 kernel address space

Hi Adrian,

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:51:05PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:00:02PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > On 16/08/19 4:45 AM, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > Hi Adrian,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 02:45:57PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > >>>> How come you cannot use kallsyms to get the information?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for pointing out this.  Sorry I skipped your comment "I don't
> > >>> know how you intend to calculate ARM_PRE_START_SIZE" when you reviewed
> > >>> the patch v3, I should use that chance to elaborate the detailed idea
> > >>> and so can get more feedback/guidance before procceed.
> > >>>
> > >>> Actually, I have considered to use kallsyms when worked on the previous
> > >>> patch set.
> > >>>
> > >>> As mentioned in patch set v4's cover letter, I tried to implement
> > >>> machine__create_extra_kernel_maps() for arm/arm64, the purpose is to
> > >>> parse kallsyms so can find more kernel maps and thus also can fixup
> > >>> the kernel start address.  But I found the 'perf script' tool directly
> > >>> calls machine__get_kernel_start() instead of running into the flow for
> > >>> machine__create_extra_kernel_maps();
> > >>
> > >> Doesn't it just need to loop through each kernel map to find the lowest
> > >> start address?
> > > 
> > > Based on your suggestion, I worked out below change and verified it
> > > can work well on arm64 for fixing up start address; please let me know
> > > if the change works for you?
> > 
> > How does that work if take a perf.data file to a machine with a different
> > architecture?
> 
> Sorry I delayed so long to respond to your question; I didn't have
> confidence to give out very reasonale answer and this is the main reason
> for delaying.

Could you take chance to review my below replying?  I'd like to get
your confirmation before I send out offical patch.

Thanks,
Leo Yan

> 
> For your question for taking a perf.data file to a machine with a
> different architecture, we can firstly use command 'perf buildid-list'
> to print out the buildid for kallsyms, based on the dumped buildid we
> can find out the location for the saved kallsyms file; then we can use
> option '--kallsyms' to specify the offline kallsyms file and use the
> offline kallsyms to fixup kernel start address.  The detailed commands
> are listed as below:
> 
> root@...ian:~# perf buildid-list
> 7b36dfca8317ef74974ebd7ee5ec0a8b35c97640 [kernel.kallsyms]
> 56b84aa88a1bcfe222a97a53698b92723a3977ca /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
> 0956b952e9cd673d48ff2cfeb1a9dbd0c853e686 /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libm-2.28.so
> [...]
> 
> root@...ian:~# perf script --kallsyms ~/.debug/\[kernel.kallsyms\]/7b36dfca8317ef74974ebd7ee5ec0a8b35c97640/kallsyms
> 
> The amended patch is as below, please review and always welcome
> any suggestions or comments!
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index 5734460fc89e..593f05cc453f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -2672,9 +2672,26 @@ int machine__nr_cpus_avail(struct machine *machine)
>  	return machine ? perf_env__nr_cpus_avail(machine->env) : 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int machine__fixup_kernel_start(void *arg,
> +				       const char *name __maybe_unused,
> +				       char type,
> +				       u64 start)
> +{
> +	struct machine *machine = arg;
> +
> +	type = toupper(type);
> +
> +	/* Fixup for text, weak, data and bss sections. */
> +	if (type == 'T' || type == 'W' || type == 'D' || type == 'B')
> +		machine->kernel_start = min(machine->kernel_start, start);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int machine__get_kernel_start(struct machine *machine)
>  {
>  	struct map *map = machine__kernel_map(machine);
> +	char filename[PATH_MAX];
>  	int err = 0;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2696,6 +2713,22 @@ int machine__get_kernel_start(struct machine *machine)
>  		if (!err && !machine__is(machine, "x86_64"))
>  			machine->kernel_start = map->start;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (symbol_conf.kallsyms_name != NULL) {
> +		strncpy(filename, symbol_conf.kallsyms_name, PATH_MAX);
> +	} else {
> +		machine__get_kallsyms_filename(machine, filename, PATH_MAX);
> +
> +		if (symbol__restricted_filename(filename, "/proc/kallsyms"))
> +			goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (kallsyms__parse(filename, machine, machine__fixup_kernel_start))
> +		pr_warning("Fail to fixup kernel start address. skipping...\n");
> +
> +out:
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> Leo Yan