[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190902144424.GB14770@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 16:44:24 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Use of probe_kernel_address() in task_rcu_dereference()
without checking return value
On 09/02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 8dc1811..1f9b021 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1134,7 +1134,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> >
> > struct tlbflush_unmap_batch tlb_ubc;
> >
> > - struct rcu_head rcu;
> > + union {
> > + bool xxx;
> > + struct rcu_head rcu;
> > + };
> >
> > /* Cache last used pipe for splice(): */
> > struct pipe_inode_info *splice_pipe;
> > diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> > index a75b6a7..baacfce 100644
> > --- a/kernel/exit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> > @@ -182,6 +182,11 @@ static void delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp)
> > put_task_struct(tsk);
> > }
> >
> > +void call_delayed_put_task_struct(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + if (xchg(&p->xxx, 1))
> > + call_rcu(&p->rcu, delayed_put_task_struct);
> > +}
>
> I think this is the first usage of xchg() on _Bool, also not all archs
> implement xchg8()
I didn't even notice I used "bool" ;)
speaking of the users of task_rcu_dereference(), membarrier_global_expedited()
does
rcu_read_lock();
p = task_rcu_dereference(&cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
if (p && p->mm && (atomic_read(&p->mm->membarrier_state) &
MEMBARRIER_STATE_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED)) {
This asks for READ_ONCE, but this is minor. Why can't p->mm be freed?
I guess it is fine to read the garbage from &p->mm->membarrier_state if we race
with the exiting task, but in theory this looks unsafe if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
Another possible user of probe_slab_address() or I am totally confused?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists