[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsijOi6TdRcObGSAJ+tS0JiZky=v6Wqh5u8RZTzi6tkjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 17:10:27 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the fuse tree
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:00 AM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 5:01 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/fuse/inode.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 1458e5e9f99a ("fuse: extract fuse_fill_super_common()")
> >
> > from the fuse tree and commit:
> >
> > 2ad9ab0f7429 ("vfs: Convert fuse to use the new mount API")
> > 48ceb15f98c8 ("vfs: Move the subtype parameter into fuse")
>
> And the latter is b0rked anyway.
Both, actually.
Pushed fixed ones to fuse.git#for-next.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists