linux-kernel - Re: Is: Default governor regardless of cpuidle driver Was: [PATCH v2] cpuidle-haltpoll: vcpu hotplug support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j8BEjdNyAn=ut9BxSH5Gphs_AivADPwXX=rJ1TF1+88A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:55:21 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc:     Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Is: Default governor regardless of cpuidle driver Was: [PATCH v2]
 cpuidle-haltpoll: vcpu hotplug support

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:24 PM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:16:05PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> > On 8/29/19 4:10 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> > > When cpus != maxcpus cpuidle-haltpoll will fail to register all vcpus
> > > past the online ones and thus fail to register the idle driver.
> > > This is because cpuidle_add_sysfs() will return with -ENODEV as a
> > > consequence from get_cpu_device() return no device for a non-existing
> > > CPU.
> > >
> > > Instead switch to cpuidle_register_driver() and manually register each
> > > of the present cpus through cpuhp_setup_state() callback and future
> > > ones that get onlined. This mimmics similar logic that intel_idle does.
> > >
> > > Fixes: fa86ee90eb11 ("add cpuidle-haltpoll driver")
> > > Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > While testing the above, I found out another issue on the haltpoll series.
> > But I am not sure what is best suited to cpuidle framework, hence requesting
> > some advise if below is a reasonable solution or something else is preferred.
> >
> > Essentially after haltpoll governor got introduced and regardless of the cpuidle
> > driver the default governor is gonna be haltpoll for a guest (given haltpoll
> > governor doesn't get registered for baremetal).
>
> Right.
>
> > Right now, for a KVM guest, the
> > idle governors have these ratings:
> >
> >  * ladder            -> 10
> >  * teo               -> 19
> >  * menu              -> 20
> >  * haltpoll          -> 21
> >  * ladder + nohz=off -> 25
>
> Yes. PowerPC KVM guests crash currently due to the use of the haltpoll
> governor (have a patch in my queue to fix this, but your solution
> embraces more cases).
>
> > When a guest is booted with MWAIT and intel_idle is probed and sucessfully
> > registered, we will end up with a haltpoll governor being used as opposed to
> > 'menu' (which used to be the default case). This would prevent IIUC that other
> > C-states get used other than poll_state (state 0) and state 1.
> >
> > Given that haltpoll governor is largely only useful with a cpuidle-haltpoll
> > it doesn't look reasonable to be the default? What about using haltpoll governor
> > as default when haltpoll idle driver registers or modloads.
> >
> > My idea to achieve the above would be to decrease the rating to 9 (before the
> > lowest rated governor) and retain old defaults before haltpoll. Then we would
> > allow a cpuidle driver to define a preferred governor to switch on idle driver
> > registration. Naturally all of would be ignored if overidden by
> > cpuidle.governor=.
> >
> > The diff below the scissors line is an example of that.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Works for me. Rafael?

It works for me too, basically, except that I would rename
cpuidle_default_governor in the patch to cpuidle_prev_governor.