linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: introduce get_available_block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:54:13 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chao@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: introduce get_available_block_count() for
 cleanup

On 08/31, Chao Yu wrote:
> There are very similar codes in inc_valid_block_count() and
> inc_valid_node_count() which is used for available user block
> count calculation.
> 
> This patch introduces a new helper get_available_block_count()
> to include those common codes, and used it instead for cleanup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - fix panic during recovery
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index a89ad8cab821..9c010e6cba5c 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1756,6 +1756,27 @@ static inline bool __allow_reserved_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned int get_available_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> +						struct inode *inode, bool cap)
> +{
> +	block_t avail_user_block_count;
> +
> +	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
> +					sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
> +
> +	if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, cap))
> +		avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
> +		if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count)
> +			avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
> +		else
> +			avail_user_block_count = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return avail_user_block_count;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void f2fs_i_blocks_write(struct inode *, block_t, bool, bool);
>  static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  				 struct inode *inode, blkcnt_t *count)
> @@ -1782,17 +1803,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  
>  	spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  	sbi->total_valid_block_count += (block_t)(*count);
> -	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
> -					sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
> +	avail_user_block_count = get_available_block_count(sbi, inode, true);
>  
> -	if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, true))
> -		avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
> -	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
> -		if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count)
> -			avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
> -		else
> -			avail_user_block_count = 0;
> -	}
>  	if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
>  		diff = sbi->total_valid_block_count - avail_user_block_count;
>  		if (diff > *count)
> @@ -2005,7 +2017,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  					struct inode *inode, bool is_inode)
>  {
>  	block_t	valid_block_count;
> -	unsigned int valid_node_count, user_block_count;
> +	unsigned int valid_node_count;
> +	unsigned int avail_user_block_count;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (is_inode) {
> @@ -2027,16 +2040,10 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  
>  	spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  
> -	valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count +
> -					sbi->current_reserved_blocks + 1;
> -
> -	if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, false))
> -		valid_block_count += F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
> -	user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count;
> -	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
> -		user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
> +	valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count + 1;
> +	avail_user_block_count = get_available_block_count(sbi, inode, false);

This doesn't look like same?

>  
> -	if (unlikely(valid_block_count > user_block_count)) {
> +	if (unlikely(valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
>  		spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  		goto enospc;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.18.0.rc1