[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e128e33-427f-19a2-0e13-95a9c0656ab1@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:08:31 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <rth@...ddle.net>, <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
<mattst88@...il.com>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<paulus@...ba.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
<borntraeger@...ibm.com>, <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
<dalias@...c.org>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <paul.burton@...s.com>,
<jhogan@...nel.org>, <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
<chenhc@...ote.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <cai@....pw>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <len.brown@...el.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<dledford@...hat.com>, <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
<linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>, <nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
<tbogendoerfer@...e.de>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] sparc64: numa: check the node id consistently for
sparc64
On 2019/9/1 4:02, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:57:04 +0800
>
>> Did you mean sparc64 system does not has ACPI, the device's node id will
>> not specified by ACPI, so the ACPI is unrelated here?
>
> Yes, sparc64 never has and never will have ACPI.
>
> This is also true for several other platforms where you have made this
> change.
>
> The assumption of your entire patch set is that the semantics of the
> NUMA node ID are somehow completely defined by ACPI semantics. Which
> is not true.
Thanks for pointing out.
The NUMA node id in sparc64 system is defined by DT semantics?
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists